Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Hand Surg Am ; 47(7): 690.e1-690.e11, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34474947

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We performed a biomechanical analysis using the finite element method to assess the effects of plate length and the number of screws on construct stiffness, stress distribution, and fracture displacement in the fixation of type A2 distal humerus fractures. METHODS: A 3-dimensional humerus model was constructed using computed tomography of a healthy man. After creating a 2-mm extra-articular fracture gap, orthogonal double-plate fixation was performed with an incremental increase in plate length and the number of screws, creating 17 fixation models. Four screws were placed in each plate's distal segment, and the number of screws was increased incrementally in the segment proximal to the fracture, starting from 2 in the medial (M) and 2 in the lateral (L) plate (M2∗L2). RESULTS: The fifth screw proximal to the fracture in the lateral plate (L5) played an essential role in increasing stiffness under bending, axial, and torsional forces surpassing the intact bone, which may have been due to the bypassing of the stress riser area. Minimum construct stiffness was created when 5 (M3∗L2) screws were inserted into the proximal segment. For bending forces, the M4∗L2 construct was stronger than M3∗L3 (total 6 proximal screws), and M5∗L3 was stronger than M4∗L4 (total 8 proximal screws), showing higher stiffness when the plates ended at different levels. The M4∗L2 construct (6 screws) had stiffness comparable with M4∗L3, M4∗L4, and M5∗L4 during bending, showing comparable stiffness with the least instrumentation density. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggested M3∗L5 as the optimum and M3∗L2 as the minimum construct to resist all bending, axial and torsional forces. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Applying the results may improve surgical techniques, decrease the rate of complications, including fixation failure and nerve injury, and optimize the time of surgery. Moreover, hardware removal is less cumbersome with fewer screws.


Assuntos
Placas Ósseas , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Parafusos Ósseos , Análise de Elementos Finitos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Humanos , Úmero , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA